|
Gifts to Minors: New Wine in an Old Bottle?
by Barbara Jo Smith and James G. Heltzel
Spring 2002
Let's assume that you would like to make a lifetime gift to
a child or a grandchild. The purpose may to be to help pay for
higher education or to move assets out of an estate so as to
reduce estate taxes. What are the options, and which is best?
Most of the time you will want the gift to qualify for the gift
tax annual exclusion, which is $11,000 this year. Gifts that
fall within the annual exclusion amount do not require the filing
of a gift tax return and do not use up any of your lifetime exemption
equivalent, which is presently $1,000,000.
There are five ways to make the gift. Some are more economical
and flexible than others, so we will first review the options
and then discuss which might work best in different situations.
Conservatorships . A conservatorship is a parallel
proceeding to a guardianship. While a guardianship is designed
to appoint someone who can make personal decisions for a minor,
a conservator is appointed to manage the minor's assets. The
conservator is appointed by a court, usually must post a bond,
and must file annual accountings with the court. Conservatorships
must end when a minor reaches the age of majority, which in Oregon
is 18. At that point all assets held in the conservatorship must
be distributed to the minor. Because conservatorhips are expensive
to establish and maintain and involve public, court proceedings,
they are generally used only as a last resort.
2503(c) Trusts . Certain trusts can also qualify
for the annual exclusion. One type is a Section 2503(c) trust.
All assets which are transferred to the trust qualify for the
gift tax annual exclusion. The trust must either terminate at
age 21 or the beneficiary must be given the right to withdraw
the assets for a period after the beneficiary reaches age 21.
The trusts are private and do not involve any court supervision.
Their principal disadvantage is the expense involved in having
a lawyer draft the trust, and the beneficiary has the right to
withdraw the assets at age 21.
Crummey Trusts . Another form of trust is one
which gives its beneficiaries the right to withdraw any assets
contributed to the trust at the time of the contribution. These
withdrawal rights are popularly known as "Crummey" withdrawal
rights after a taxpayer who prevailed in a court dispute back
in 1969. Even if the beneficiary who has the withdrawal right
may be a minor, the gift will still qualify for the gift tax
annual exclusion. Once the beneficiary does not withdraw the
asset, the asset can remain in the trust for an indefinite period.
Crummey powers are most frequently seen in irrevocable life insurance
trusts. Their use in trusts which have income producing assets
presents a number of income tax issues which have not been fully
resolved.
Custodianships . A popular alternative for
making gifts to minors is a custodianship, which is also known
as a transfer under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act. The
custodianship is created when an asset is registered in the name
of the custodian for the benefit of a minor. The proceeding is
entirely private, as with a trust, and no accountings need to
be made to any court. The principal disadvantage of a custodianship
is that, until this year, it ended when the minor reached age
21.
The most recent Oregon legislature amended the law to allow
a custodianship to last until the beneficiary reaches age 25.
Because of federal estate and gift tax law, there is a question
as to whether a gift to a custodian that is to last until the
beneficiary reaches age 25 will qualify for the gift tax annual
exclusion. We can only wait until this question is resolved.
Taxation . One of the disadvantages of all
four techniques is that the income from the asset may be taxed
to the beneficiary or at trust income tax rates. If income is
taxed to a beneficiary and the beneficiary is under age 14, the "kiddie
tax" will apply, which means that in 2002 any income from the
assets in excess of $1,500 will be taxed at the parents' rate.
Trust income tax rates are generally less favorable than personal
tax rates.
Section 529 Plans . Against this backdrop Congress
adopted Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 529
is an enabling statute which provides a framework within which
states can adopt education savings programs. Oregon and many
other states have done so. If the gift to the minor is for education
purposes, a 529 program will provide a highly advantageous method
of making the gift. The primary advantages, compared to the methods
described above, are as follows:
1. Transfers to a 529 program qualify for the gift tax annual
exclusion, and a donor can use up his or her annual exclusion
for a donee for this year and the next four years (a total of
$55,000) in one transfer. The donor must live the five years
to avoid having part of the transfer included in his or her estate.
2. Income generated by the assets is not subject to current
income taxes. In this respect its taxation is similar to an IRA.
3. If the funds, including accumulated income, are used by the
beneficiary for qualified education expenses, the accumulated
income is never taxed. The funds do not have to be used at schools
in the state sponsoring the plan.
4. Various money managers have been chosen by states which have
529 programs, and an account is established by filling out a
form. No trust agreement is necessary.
5. The donor may change the beneficiary.
There are some disadvantages to a 529 program, as follows:
1. Only cash may be contributed.
2. Management of the investments is by the money manager with
very little control by the donor.
When the donor desires to transfer a particular asset to a child
or a grandchild, a 529 program is not a substitute for a conservatorship,
a trust or a custodianship. On the other hand, when the primary
purpose of the gift is to fund education, the 529 program offers
significant gift and income tax advantages.
As shown above, the best vehicle for making lifetime gifts to
minors will depend on the purpose of the gift and the extent
to which the donor wishes to exert influence over the investment
of the gift assets.
|